This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

phil ethics random

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
Feinberg - two senses of duty

Old sense-Mill-what we owe to others, what may be exacted from us as one exacts a debt, what are due someone else-correlative rights

New sense-any action understood to be required-often no rights that correlate to duties in this sense

Feinberg - Nowhersville - duties without correlative rights

no one has rights, people virtuous, act benevolently, duties in new sense of moral requirements, weak desert fitting students judges, oblig owed God mairrage promise

legal-owe obed to law

Charity-no one claim contrib due

Difference between our world and Nowheresville - Feinberg 

main difference is activity of claiming-badly treated o do not demand against another-no notion of rights so no notion of due, so do not claim

 

Feinberg's analysis of rights - the strategy

right kind of claim, claim is 'assertion of right'-so cannot just define terms eachother-use idea claim in informal elucid idea right

Claiming rule-gov activ-c only have r to, behalf onself, perform-have is position claim

r is valid

Deck Info

4

adamcureton