This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

gphil exam 2

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
empiricism
all our knowledge come directly or indirectly from sense perception Mill
rationalism
some of our knowledge about reality does not come directly or indirectly from sense perception descartes and kant
partial skepticism
there are some things one cannot know not objectionable
universal skepticism
one cannot know anything faulty position cannot be articulated without the assumption that one knows something
descartes tries to refute universal skepticism
wants to find one statement that cannot ever be doubted, it will show 2 things: something that is absolutely certain and cannot be doubted the mind has the capacity to know
foundationalism
view that a theory of knowldege must be founded on something that is absolutely certain i am, i exist
ontological proof
from the conception one had of x to the claim that x actually exists. always commit fallacy of existential instantiation proof for the existence of God
fallacy of existential instantation
just because we have an idea of something doesn't mean it exists
metaphysical dualism
mind and body differ in essence essence of boy is extension and the essense of mind is thinking gives rise to the mind body problem
mind body problem
how does the mind get the body to do anything? assumes that something immaterial (thinking) cannot affect something physical (extended in space)
metaphysical monism
position that the person is not comprised of 2 distinct essences.
monadology
everything both physical and mental is comprised of monads intended to resolve the mind body problem, if even physical things are comprised of non physical monads, physical and non physical things do not differ in essence and they can affect eachother falls under rational metaphysics
monads
windowless invisible centers of intelligence
hume
wanted to show that knowledge calims such as those made in rationalistic metaphysics are not legitimate knowledge claims all objects of human understanding fall into 2 groups ideas of matters relations of ideas
kant
believed metaphyisc involved claims about reality and if metaphysic was to be more mere opinion the claims must be true apriori and apriori
classical realism
human mind has the capactiy to know and there is a reality that can be directly known Adler
complex sense perceptions
sense deceive us
simple sense perceptions
arms, head, legs: physical parts becomes more difficult to doubt
corporeality in general
extended in space, size, numbers... harder to doubt more abstract and general
complex sciences
physics, medicine easier to doubt more complex than simple based on sense perception
simple sciences
geometry, arthimetic harder to doubt than complex sciences
clear and distinct
self evidently true cant imagine contrary
matter of cat
contrary to any matter of fact is always possible not contradictory to deny based on sense perception based on cause and effect experience based on senses informative
relations of ideas
if ture, necessarily ture, cant deny cannot deny wo contradicting yourself evidence by reason alone principle of noncontradiction not informative
cause and effect
a causes b a come before b cnstant conjuction, if a, then b a and be must be contigious (touching)
aposteriori
empirical any knowledge coes after experience objects impress on the mind
a priori
mind contributes somethign to object and experience mind=active neccesary and hold strict universality do not depend on expeirence
sense perception formal and material
formal: apriori- holds true for every sense perception material- what differentiates one sense from another
strict formal rules
independent of a given experience necessary strict universality
knowledge
attributing something to a subject a feature is attached or unattached to the subject
judgements
subject and predicate every judgment has a quantity univseral, particular, or singular
synthetic
the predicate is not contained in the subject gives you info this chalk is white
analytic
the predicate is contained in the subject dont need outside observation 2+2=4
synthetic apostori
matter of fact
analytical apriori
relations of ideas
percept
what we gather and take from an object
idea
that by which we make something else outside of ideas... by which we know somethign else
solipcism
ideas are figments of our imagination
nominalism
gneral terms dont refer to anything
conceptual construct
concept with no instantiation
instantiation
point to an existing objects

Deck Info

41

chloe

permalink