This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

Neuro psych

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
Bodamer 47
people w anomia - same only for faces - prosopagnosia
De Renzi 86
are faces harder?
De Renzi 87
Prosopagnostic patient - could disting dogs, coins, breeds - used colour and featural info?
Bruyer 83
Mr W - recog cows but not faces
Assal 84
MR X could recognt cows or faces
McNeil & Warrington 93
WJ - prosopagnosic, could recog sheep, learn sheep not faces
Young 93
32 ex-servicemen w brain lesions ; face id; fam decision; simultaneous face matching; sequential face matching; expression matching; expression recog
RH lesion
unfam faces only deficit
5 LH lesion
expression deficit
Bruce and Young
Valerie - right temp lobe prob - prosopagnosic
Young Hellawell & Dehann 88
DH : forced face to name matching ; associative priming- fam judge RT to name following face prime
FU- PIN = disrupted so only ltd activation but enough to prime
Bauer 84
famous and non famous but no capgras
Ellis & Young 90
Proso - ventral damage, Capgras- dorsal damage
Capgras
replaced by imposters
Fregoli
person diguising self
Intermetamorphosis
rapid appearance change - look like someone else; occur through epilepsy
Ellis 97
SCR to fam face- amy, SCR to tones cingulate
Ellis 2000
capgras do show associative priming
Covert recog
autonomic recog
Hirstein & Ramachandran 97
Patient imposter- not when phoned
Lewis 2001
patient HL : capgras for faces only
Prob w capgras-
prob to prior PIN level
Capgras 23
Don't normally show SCR response
David 93
capgras allows us to see probs w cog models
Ellis and de pau 94
capgras result from neuro, toxic, other organic
De Pau 94
Traditional explanations of capgras - hard to explain
Ellis 96
Object capgras
Haxby 2000
Prosopagnosia- face recog after loss of right inferotemporal region
Tranel 95
failed to respond to other emotional stim
Renault 89
CNS measures
Proso
Intact overt & absence covert
Ellis and Young
9SCRs 2 low tone - capgras normal response: therefore not CNS
Ramachandran
Telephone OK
Routes to recog
ventral- lontitudinal fasciculus btw visual cortex and limbic system
Ventral
Obj perception- shape and colour
Dorsal
Spatial location/ place
Breen 2000
if saw familiar chair vs chair!
Coltheart 97
Breen doesn't describe how to fail to receive confirmation; delusion
Farah 93
info reintergrated: data identified by comparing joint info
James 50
When know person have automatic "glow"
Stone & Young 97
Bias in favour of observational adequacy
Young 99
Delusion manifest after abnormality- attribution stage therefore change in SCR
Bruce and Young model
see pic
Young and Burton 99
Lesions lead to graded degredation of info processing
Critchley 2000
SCR correl w amy
Tranel 85
SCR after faces
Ellis 93
Covert recog= SCR - prosopag
Visual imparement
see pic
Tasks to learn proso capg
name learning, face interference, name face pairing
Bauer 86 - evidence for dual route
autonomic recognition not found in apperceptive patients - unable to activate stored visual info for face
Tranel &b Demasio
Covert recog in prosopag w SCR
Damasion & Damasio 95
unsure if diff btw appercept due to anatomical localisation or extent of lesion
Bauer, Verfaellie 88
80% accurate of face match - face perception intact-
Tranel & Damasio 98
Associative prosopag- normal SCRs
Baron cohen 2000
not only pathway for autonomic response - SCR can come from frontal lobe lesions
Ungerlider *& Mishkin 82
Visual pathways: lesion studies, ventral and dorsal p-ways, lesion inferior temp lobe, visual deficit, 2d vs 3D, parietal lobe lesions - no deficit, landmark lesions
Breen, Coltheart & Caine 1999
Pins or affective come from FRU
Bauer
2 routes to face recog
Milner & goodale 95
amy holds emotion info
Milner 91
DF: visual agnosia : could reach for stuff : hand slot etc : not able to say where put hand in slot - unable to percieve orientating
Goodale 94
RV: couldn't describe obj shape - motor function ok
Tranel & demasio
Show patient, had SCr from familiar objects
Match face
Ventral temporal lobe
Prosopag
Ventral pathway prob
Herstin & Ramachandran 97
spoke to parents on phone
Farah 90
Prosopags- weak SCR- long rctn time, covert recog - not normal recog - tested covertly
(Burton et al., 1991
published, a key question has been whether overt and covert face recognition are
Bobes(2003)
same impairment that causes prosopagnosia may explain an impairment in sequential (but not simultaneous) matching of unfamiliar faces
Schweinberger& Burton 2002
Bobes used no time delay between the sequentially presented faces
Schweinberger& Burton 2003
Bobes- critisism, still don't know whether unfamiliar andfamiliar faces are processed by the same mechanisms.
Schweinberger& Burton 2004
Bobes-it would have been interesting to see whether ERP findings would support a normal timing of familiar face perception in FE

Deck Info

72

permalink